“Reptile and creature!”: Former friends and associates attacked Ksenia Sobchak with insults. Who sent whom Evgeny Chichvarkin and Ksenia Sobchak

The nomination of Ksenia Sobchak for president was perceived by many as “participation in a fixed match.” One of those who accused the TV presenter of this was Evgeny Chichvarkin, who once himself took part in a deal with the authorities with a similar meaning, which he later greatly regretted. Businessman on his Instagram noted that businessman Prokhorov, who also took part in the “agreement,” then complained that he was simply manipulated. As a result, Chichvarkin sadly admitted that, with all due respect, he would be forced to send Sobchak to a well-known address, because she makes Putin legitimate and “knocks down” Navalny. Sobchak did not respond to the accusations; only her husband, actor Maxim Vitorgan, who sent Chichvarkin to a similar address, reacted sparingly.In conversation withThe Insider Evgeny Chichvarkin told what Sobchak can get for participating in the campaign, why Putin is mortally afraid of Navalny and how “fixed matches” with the Kremlin work.

Sobchak may not have entered into a relationship with the presidential administration, but she definitely has an agreement with Putin personally. I have no evidence, but my instinct tells me that this is a direct agreement with the president. In part, Putin has already achieved his goal - created squabbles among liberals. This is the first time I am actively participating in it - usually I stayed on the sidelines, but now I decided differently because it affected me personally.

The reason is simple - they are offering us a simulator of the political process, in the eyes of the entire West, “legitimate elections” will be held in Russia.People who usually criticize Putin will also be brought up; they are already calling for people to come and vote. Those, for example, Anton Krasovsky or Mikhail Zygar support what is happening - a split in the liberal camp that is already split into smithereens.

What does Ksenia Sobchak need? This is obvious, all channels have already shown her for free, reminding a wide audience of her (after all, until 2012, Sobchak was constantly on TV, and then disappeared). Her Instagram account, which can get 1.2 million likes at a time, is a serious money printing machine. T Now, to those areas that she has already covered - glamour, travel, clothing, childcare, sayings, smart phrases - many other areas will be added. In the next six months, Sobchak’s sphere of influence will increase by several million people, and her income will increase significantly. I think she will earn more in the next year than in her entire previous life. Sobchak will become the most influential woman in Russia. I have zero doubt about this, what she really knows how to do is monetize.

A year before the next elections, she will offer herself as a successor who will help Putin’s entire gang and him personally avoid lustration

Yes, at the same time she found big number opponents, but there are 2% of us - liberals, outcasts, emigrants and other ins and outs of the louse. MYou are unhappy, but everyone else will be happy, because they will be shown on TV how good Sobchak is. Her athey will criticize carefully, but at the same time they will offer beautiful picture: she is a spectacular woman, attractive to spectators and in particular men. They will promote her, they will make a serious booster to her name, she will be able to launch her own media and some topic that will not be propaganda in the next five years. A year before next elections she will offer herself as a successor who will help Putin’s entire gang and him personally avoid lustration.Sobchak is not a liberal at all, she is an absolute weather vane. You know, cats have antennae, snakes have a sense of smell. Sobchak has many talents. And an eye like an eagle.

Now Alexey Navalny must very seriously think through his economic program so that it is not against everything bad and for everything good, and challenge Sobchak to a big three-hour full-fledged debate. With a program where there should be no vague answers about taxes, about Crimea, about lustration, about Putin’s future. Also, if I were him, I would also call all the other candidates, although it is clear that no one except Zhirinovsky will want to participate, but she will come.

If we imagine the situation that people come to elections today, in which all the famous candidates and Navalny are participating, then I think Putin will get 40%, maybe 35%, and Navalny will have 30-35%.Now Alexey is unlikely to win, but his percentage will be no less than in the elections in Moscow. People who are alone with their “ballot,” as they say in the provinces, vote unpredictably. We see from Trump and Brexit that exit polls are bullshit, they don’t work, people lie, they try to look good.

However, when they walk into the booth, voters put a dick on European integration, a dick on tolerance, a dick on the rights of people of color, the poor and women, they put a dick on it all. Even those who don’t actually have this member. This is not an unfounded statement, we see the exit polls and their difference from the voting results, this has already happened twice in eight months.Of course, people will say that they are for Putin, if you ask them about it now, for Navalny, probably 5-6%, maximum 8%.

It is clear that the Caucasian republics, Chechnya, essentially do not vote, this is a simulation - Putin will have 101% there. But if you ask real Chechens, young people in Grozny, I’m sure they will reveal an amazingly high anti-Putin rating. In fact, “against Putin” is Navalny, which is why Sobchak is torpedoing him.

Navalny is not an economist, he had no experience as a full-fledged official, and for some time his area of ​​activity was exclusively the Internet. Everything would be simpler if he were a successful governor or mayor who has an entire province or city that reminds everyone how good it was under him and how responsive he is. Or if he had his own company where employees would remember him. It’s harder for Navalny in this regard, but, nevertheless, his anti-corruption agenda is as strong as a bulldozer.

The problem is, that Western countries are mostly run by donkeys chosen by lazy socialists, they are populists and slugs

That’s why Putin is so afraid of Navalny. There are two things that can knock his arrogance down: Western demandsallowing Navalny to participate in the elections and the decision to postpone the World Cup due to terrorist activities. Both options are fatal to political career Putin in Russia. The problem is, that Western countries are mainly run by donkeys chosen by lazy socialists, they are populists and slugs. I'm afraid that neither one nor the other will happen. INAll this hypocrisy - both here and there.

As I already wrote, ten years ago I was also offered a “fixed match” with the authorities. I did big mistake. At the same time, no one in the Kremlin even told me what exactly to do. Everyone understands what they want from them, what is possible and what is not, at the level of their fingertips. I’ve made an agreement here, they’ll show you on all TV, and if you suddenly say something wrong, they’ll come to you again and say: “Please don’t do this,” and your behavior will be corrected.

Most people have a completely Orwellian self-stop, and they don’t need to be corrected at all. They simply control the banks and are in this muddy stream, playing their role in such a way that there is no need to twitch at all - they feel and understand everything.You follow the Kremlin’s policies and meet, for example, with Vladislav Yuryevich Surkov. If you are not an idiot, you will behave in such a way that no one will ever correct you. For example, no one was definitely holding me back and no one was telling me: “Please don’t say this.”

I clearly understood what they needed and tried to please them. This is a pure, 100% agreement. I have not sworn allegiance to the liberals before - this is an absolute fact, and I have not gone to the March of Dissent before - this is a fact. Criminal cases were opened against me and I had a lot of debts, this is also a fact. In addition, until 2007, our country had consistent economic growth; under these conditions, I saw no reason why not negotiate with the authorities.

It all ended badly, so I say in plain text: if you drink with thieves, beware of your wallet. And if with bandits, then for your head. Ksyusha, I think,everything is voluntary, she probably accepted the offer with great pleasure and seized the initiative, because in a very short term it will bring her millions, if not tens of millions of dollars.

Ksenia Sobchak had a private conversation with Vladimir Putin, the BBC Russian Service reported, citing its sources. The formal topic of conversation was an interview for a film about Anatoly Sobchak, the first mayor of St. Petersburg and the father of the journalist. The fact that the film is being prepared was confirmed by the TV presenter’s mother Lyudmila Narusova. According to her, the President of Russia should really be one of the speakers in the documentary.

As journalists found out, after filming, Putin and Sobchak stayed to talk face to face. Presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov left no comment on this meeting. And the TV presenter herself told Kommersant FM that reports of a personal conversation with the president are part of the information war against her: “I’m terribly tired of these “leaks.” And I'm not going to comment on them. This already looks like some kind of information war with me, and I don’t want to participate in it in any way.”

The media have repeatedly called Sobchak a possible participant in the 2018 presidential elections. Thus, the Vedomosti newspaper reported that the appearance of a woman in the political race is one of the Kremlin’s projects. The journalist responded that she does not cooperate with the presidential administration. At the same time, Vladimir Putin himself did not rule out the possible participation of Ksenia Sobchak in presidential elections in 2018. Later, the TV presenter gave an interview to the glossy Glamor magazine, in which she did not deny her possible participation in the fight for the presidency.

Most likely, Sobchak will announce his desire to run for office in the very near future, says political scientist Stanislav Belkovsky: “Ksenia Sobchak is known for her political ambitions, including at the presidential level. That is, this is her initiative. And she met with Vladimir Putin because she wanted to hear assurances from him that her candidacy would not be removed from the elections by force. Apparently she received them. Therefore, I assume that in the coming days Ksenia Sobchak will announce her participation in the presidential elections. I haven’t known her for very long, but I can say that she has political ambitions, she wants to be president. Of course, she is not going to fight with Vladimir Putin, she is a fairly realistic-minded person, but in some perspective she is aspiring to the highest post in the country.”

I don’t think that the authorities have any interest here; rather, they simply do not interfere with this hype and observe the situation from the outside.

As they say, the dog barks - the caravan moves on. “In addition, I don’t know a single person who, in a sober mind and sound mind, could imagine how Ksenia Sobchak becomes the president of Russia.”

Ksenia Sobchak and Vladimir Putin met only to discuss the film, emphasized Andrei Mironov, head of the Foundation for the Study of Electoral Processes and Electoral Policy. Their conversation could hardly have any relation to the presidential elections, the expert adds: “The version that the journalist met with Vladimir Putin precisely as part of the preparation of a film about Anatoly Sobchak is more plausible than about her political ambitions. Without the participation of the head of state, the picture about her father would be incomplete. The formation of Sobchak as political leader happened before the eyes of Vladimir Putin. Therefore, naturally, he knows the issues that illuminate the life of the ex-governor in St. Petersburg like no one else. So I consider Ksenia Sobchak’s appeal to him to be quite natural.”

The other day, Sobchak’s husband, actor Maxim Vitorgan, stood up for her in his video message to businessman Evgeny Chichvarkin. He had earlier, in an obscene form, called on the TV presenter to give up her presidential ambitions. According to Chichvarkin, this will “legitimize” Russian President Vladimir Putin and “bring down” oppositionist Alexei Navalny. Vitorgan responded by publishing a video in which he responded to the businessman in a similar harsh manner.

Last week, Ksenia Sobchak’s husband, actor Maxim Vitorgan, turned to businessman Yevgeny Chichvarkin, who said that he would “send” Sobchak and her entire team if she stood as a candidate in the 2018 presidential elections. Vitorgan’s appeal is published by Telegram news channels, Lenta.ru reports. Vitorgan stated that, unlike Chichvarkin, he did not participate in “fixed matches.” “That’s why I’m telling you right away: fuck yourself... That’s all.” Musician Sergei Shnurov also stood up for Sobchak. He published an obscene poem on Instagram about the “bombed gentlemen” Navalny and Chichvarkin, who do not allow the “woman” into politics. Chichvarkin published an appeal to Sobchak on October 11. According to the businessman, the TV presenter is going to play a “fixed match” with the authorities, in which, as he put it, he also tried to participate by mistake, but as a result left the country.

Zakhar Prilepin, writer:

What passions they have there!

What a rich and self-sufficient world.

Political emigrant and oppositionist, former owner of "" Evgeny Chichvarkin called on Ksenia Sobchak not to run for the post of President of Russia in 2018. Otherwise, he says, I’ll send you and your team to three letters. He even listed the letters in the correct sequence.

So you understand what's going on?

Chichvarkin seriously believes that Alexei Navalny can win the elections in Russia.

But Sobchak, Chichvarkin believes, can stop him.

According to, if I may say so, Chichvarkin’s logic, for Putin, for example, 50 million Russians can vote, and the other 50 million can vote for Navalny. But if Sobchak goes, 25 million of Navalny’s electorate will vote for her, and the tyrant will win again. Logic, right?

Chichvarkin - he was the head of Euroset, he probably communicated with some living people, he scolded his managers, for example. The cleaning lady could have been seen by chance in the corridor. Perhaps he even met two workers on the street and once again noticed a peasant in a field in the distance.

But, damn, where did he find these people - who can choose Alexei or Ksenia for president? What do these people look like? How are four senior high school classes on the streets of Moscow? How else?

To be fair, we note that Sobchak herself immediately denied information about her possible participation in the presidential elections - that is, in fact, she is smarter than Chichvarkin.

However, what Sobchak said has no effect on Chichvarkin: he tramples his feet and threatens the young woman and young mother with curses.

Why he pestered her is unclear. Otherwise there is no one else to pester.

There is, for example, an opposition politician like Ilya Ponomarev. So he, unlike Chichvarkin, does not want to see Alexei Navalny as president.

“To Navalny,” Ponomarev said the other day, “I wish him every success, I would like him to be allowed to participate in the elections, but I definitely won’t support him, because I don’t believe that under him authoritarianism will end. Rather, it will only get stronger, only on the other hand.” team, and this is unacceptable to me."

And who will Ponomarev support in this case, you ask?

And he has already replied that he is ready to support three other candidates “immediately and without any reservations”: Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Dmitry Gudkov and Yevgeny Roizman.

Like in that song: “Three white horses, oh, three white horses...”

Maybe Chichvarkin should send three more letters: to all of the above? And Ponomarev at the same time.

Chichvarkin's epistolary legacy in this case does not threaten to become diverse in terms of style and content: rather, on the contrary. He may well send the same letters to everyone and only change the names. Euroset in action.

And imagine, Mikhail Khodorkovsky opens a letter in a beautiful envelope, and there Chichvarkin also tells him: if I decide to go to the polls, I will be forced to send both you and your team...

It would be interesting to see the expression on Mikhail Borisovich’s face at this moment.

And if he decided to write a response letter, what would it be about?

True, none of the above were going to the elections - but suddenly. Sobchak, as we remember, is not going to either, but they are already writing to her.

And this is wonderful, because in such a policy the main thing is enthusiasm, noise, drive, stakes.

Meanwhile, rates on Alexei Navalny are tending to fall.

And his correspondence match with video blogger Anatoly Shariy does not look entirely convincing - and for Navalny, and not for Shariy; and Navalny’s meeting with Igor Strelkov unexpectedly turned out to be, to put it mildly, unsuccessful - again for Navalny, and not for Strelkov.

Or here's some more news. Lawyer Boris Kuznetsov undertook to examine Navalny’s lawsuit against Alisher Usmanov and discovered that all this was nonsense and Alexey was a zero as a lawyer.

Lawyer Kuznetsov, which is typical, is also one of the oppositionists: he left Russia and has no sympathy for our tyrannical government.

And yet, Alexey and his legal work leave no stone unturned.

What is happening among the opposition, someone tell me? Why do they all dislike each other so much? Because they love themselves very much? Or because there is nothing to love others for?

Someone should finally explain what the meaning of this carnival is.

For the first time: https://www.facebook.com/zaharprilepin

Select the fragment with the error text and press Ctrl+Enter