Arched hangar construction permit. Permitting documentation for the construction of modular buildings, comparison with conventional buildings. Hangars. Construction of frameless hangars. Installation

The construction of hangars allows you to solve most of the tasks, without large financial costs (for example, the construction of a frameless hangar does not require large financial investments, you can find out about the cost). Before starting construction work, a natural question remains to be resolved: “When constructing a light building such as a hangar, is it necessary to obtain permission for construction, if so, which one?”

Is it required to obtain a permit for the construction of a hangar under the legislation of the Russian Federation?

Article 51 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation states that obtaining permits for construction is necessary in cases where it affects other objects existing on the site. If the integrity of surrounding buildings is compromised and there is a threat of collapse and danger to people, then a permit is required. Exceptions are specified there. The same article defines cases when permits are not required. This is if the hangar cannot be classified as a permanent building. Temporary, collapsible, mobile buildings are just like this. In most cases, these are awnings, kiosks, etc.

When is a permit required to build a hangar?

The legislation evaluates objects from the point of view of belonging to real estate. If there is a causal connection with the land on which the structure is erected, then it belongs to the category of real estate. This means permission will be required. The determining factor for establishing communication is the inability to move the object without causing damage.

In fact, the presence of a foundation, its type, the presence of communication lines connected to the object, as well as the presence of utilities are considered:

• water supply;
• sewerage;
• centralized heating;
• laying a fixed power line.

Based on the above characteristics, it is established that the object belongs to the category of real estate. In this case, permission is required. And if we are building a temporary hangar, is it necessary to obtain a construction permit?

Is it necessary to obtain a building permit if the hangar serves as a temporary technical building?

If the hangar structure is installed as a temporary facility (at a construction site, for agricultural purposes for harvesting, and so on), then permission will not be required even if there are signs of real estate. It is important that the technical documentation indicates the possibility of dismantling the hangar for subsequent installation.

What is required for legal installation of a hangar

Most cases involve permanent installation for production purposes. In this case, it is necessary to obtain permits. Their complete list consists of:

• documents on ownership or lease of land indicating the intended purpose - development;
• design documentation for the hangar;
• economic feasibility study for construction;
• project indicating the location and area occupied by the hangar;
• statement from the owner of the structure being constructed.

The authorities that issue permits are city and regional councils. The above documents are submitted there. Next comes coordination. If no legitimate reasons or grounds for refusal are identified, permission will be issued.

Can they refuse?

The answer is yes, yes they can. A legal right is granted if there are objective reasons, and the construction of a structure contradicts the current legislation of the Russian Federation.

There are many reasons for refusal. The most common problems encountered are:

1. The construction of a hangar by its appearance and location violates the architecture and landscape of the surrounding area, thereby disfiguring the city within its borders.
2. The design documentation does not provide for sufficient safety in environmental issues, sanitary standards, fire safety, and so on.
3. Inability to carry out construction due to the presence of poor soils (quicksands, subsidence, etc.), as well as when the depth of groundwater does not allow it.
4. Other reasons.

What to do if permission to build a hangar has not been issued

The legislation does not oblige government agencies to indicate the reasons for making such a decision. But the developer must be offered an alternative option. These could be:

• making changes to engineering and technical documentation in order to finalize the requirements specified by the government agency to full compliance with fire safety, sanitary standards, and so on;
• reducing the overall dimensions of the hangar in length or height;
• reducing the weight of the structure by installing a less powerful foundation and eliminating large dimensions.

When the refusal is unmotivated and no alternative proposal has been received, it is necessary to immediately file a claim in court. Such cases are considered by regional arbitration courts.

Settle all issues with regulatory authorities for our clients. By taking on all the hassle associated with town planning and other bureaucratic organizations, we help save you time, money and nerves. Our managers and lawyers will quickly and efficiently prepare all documents, and we will be able to quickly move from the preparatory stage to construction. By purchasing a hangar from our company, you will receive a high-quality and reliable structure, and we will take care of all the worries!

1500 price
question

the issue is resolved

Collapse

Lawyers' answers (5)

Explanation of the Ministry of Regional Development (no longer valid) but deserves attention.

The document has become invalid or cancelled.

<Письмо>Ministry of Regional Development of Russia dated June 21, 2012 N 15319-AP/08<Об отнесении сооружений к объектам капитального строительства>

MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

In connection with the appeal for clarification of legislation on urban development activities by the Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation within the framework of the exercise of powers to develop state policy and legal regulation in the field of construction, established by paragraphs 1 and 5.5 of the Regulations on the Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation, approved by decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated January 26, 2005 N 40, the following is reported.
When considering the issue of classifying a specific structure as a capital construction project, it is necessary to take into account in each case its features, including technical characteristics, duration of use, connection with the ground (the possibility of free movement of these objects without causing disproportionate damage to their purpose).
In particular, communication structures that are not related to capital construction projects are:
1) towers on loaded supports (prefabricated communication structures in the form
supports installed on a monolithic slab cast directly on the ground (only the turf layer is removed) or on a prepared earthen area (the turf layer is removed, sand and gravel filling with compaction is made) with fastening with guy wires on loaded supports from prefabricated reinforced concrete structures);
2) prefabricated and collapsible engineering structures with bolted connections with a load-bearing part made in the form of a frame support, installed on a gravel/crushed stone backfill or concrete slabs, and loaded with foundation blocks;
3) masts, which are prefabricated engineering structures (lattice prisms), secured with guys, the number of which depends on the height of the mast, attached to concrete foundation blocks.
The listed structures do not have signs of capital, namely: there is no strong connection with the ground and no deep foundation; when constructing these objects, significant earthworks (digging pits) are not required; they are not connected to the area by utility networks for heating, hot/cold water supply, or sewerage.
The indicated communication structures are easily erected, prefabricated structures, for which repeated dismantling, moving to another location and subsequent installation are possible while maintaining the performance qualities and design characteristics of the structural elements, without loss of technical properties and technological functions.
According to Part 3 of Article 49, Clause 2 of Part 17 of Article 51 and Part 1 of Article 54 of the Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation, in the case of construction or reconstruction of objects that are not capital construction projects, the issuance of a building permit is not required, state examination and state construction supervision are not carried out.
We ask you to bring the position of the Ministry to the attention of state construction supervision authorities.

A.A.POPOV

Indentations must be observed taking into account fire safety standards, depending on the fire hazard class of your facility.

It is better to involve a specialist in the field of fire safety

Federal Law of July 22, 2008 N 123-FZ “Technical Regulations on Fire Safety Requirements” (as amended and supplemented)

Article 69. Fire distances between buildings, structures and forest areas (forest parks)

1. Fire distances between buildings, structures must ensure that fire does not spread to adjacent buildings and structures. It is allowed to reduce the fire distances specified in tables 12, , , , and appendices to this Federal Law from buildings, structures and technological installations to the adjacent protection objects when using fire barriers provided for in Article 37 of this Federal Law. In this case, the calculated value of fire risk should not exceed the permissible value of fire risk established by Article 93 of this Federal Law.

SP 4.13130.2013. General fire safety requirements

Your colleagues indicated the sanction to you. A fine for unauthorized construction if it is recognized that the construction of a hangar requires a building permit.

Another sanction is indicated in the example of judicial practice I cited - a claim for the demolition of an unauthorized building, again when the object is recognized as a permanent structure.

If you have any questions, you can ask them.

Sincerely! G.A. Kuraev

Magazine "Real Estate and Investments. Legal Regulation"

Legal regulation of the construction of temporary and auxiliary facilities, as well as the construction of unauthorized buildings

Emelyanov A.S., Spetsstroyservis-R LLC

Modern Russian legislation, while quite fully regulating legal relations in the field of construction activities in the form of normative establishment of various requirements for the construction of real estate, nevertheless, in some cases, provides for a simplified procedure for the construction of structures: in particular, without the need to obtain a construction permit, to carry out state examination of design documentation.

And if relatively recently a legislative simplification of the procedure for legalizing suburban real estate used for the purposes of gardening and personal farming (the so-called dacha amnesty) appeared, then the simplified procedure for the construction of real estate for other purposes has been known to Russian law for quite a long time.

The relations for the subsequent recognition of ownership of constructed objects intersect very closely with the above-mentioned legal relations for construction, which is reflected and discussed in this article.

Let's try to figure out in what cases entrepreneurs and legal entities can take advantage of this simplified procedure for legalizing their buildings and structures.

According to paragraph 17 of Art. 51 of the Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation (GrK RF) no building permits required in particular in the following cases:

• construction of facilities, that are not objects of capital construction (kiosks, canopies, etc.);
• construction of buildings and structures on a land plot auxiliary use.

According to paragraph 10 of Art. 1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, a capital construction object (CCF) is a building, structure, structure, as well as objects of unfinished construction, excluding temporary buildings, kiosks, sheds and other similar structures.

Thus, the legislator does not classify temporary buildings of various kinds as OKS, for which the issuance of construction permits is not required. Construction permits are not required for the construction of structures or buildings for auxiliary use, which, however, following the meaning of the law, can be considered as OKS if at the same time they do not represent temporary buildings.

A significant legal difference between temporary buildings and auxiliary structures is that temporary buildings, due to their design features and based on existing judicial practice, are not subsequently recognized as real estate, i.e. it will be impossible to register ownership of them.

Based on para. 1 clause 1 art. 130 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, a thing can be classified as immovable if it has a strong connection with the land and it is impossible to move it without disproportionate damage to its purpose. Also, strength and non-consumability are indicated as necessary characteristics of real estate in the theory of civil law. In this regard, temporary portable buildings of a prefabricated type (tents, kiosks, pavilions, etc.) are logically excluded from the composition of real estate.

The above legal definitions of real estate, enshrined in legislation, are currently the main criteria for recognizing objects as such in court.

In addition, the characteristics inherent to real estate and associated with continuity with the ground include such characteristic features as the presence of a foundation and the impossibility of separating an object from the foundation without causing significant damage to it, the presence of various communications in it: gas, electricity, water and etc., quite high cost (temporary buildings, on the contrary, do not have foundations, they are basically prefabricated structures that can be moved to any other place without much damage to them; as a rule, less money is spent on their construction a lot of money and time).

Meanwhile, the existence of such a generally evaluative algorithm and the absence of any legislative codification of a specific list of objects that should be classified as real estate often results in both state registration as real estate of structures that are not such, and an unlawful refusal to register real real estate objects property, which in the future can lead to legal disputes in which the court sorts out the essence of the existing relations and establishes whether this or that object belongs to real estate or not and whether the ownership of it is subject to registration.

In this regard, when deciding whether to classify an object as real estate, it is recommended to adhere to the following rule: a building or structure can be classified as real estate only if its movement is impossible without disproportionate damage to them.

Considering the issue of temporary buildings, we can conclude that the legislator classifies all public buildings as real estate, and temporary buildings that are not public buildings will be movable things, i.e. it is assumed that they can be moved without any damage to their purpose and intended use.

Thus, clause 1.1 of GrN 81-05-01-2001 includes temporary buildings and structures that are specially erected or adapted for the construction period: production, warehouse, auxiliary, residential and public buildings and structures necessary for construction and installation work and servicing construction workers .

In clause 1.2 of the Regulations on the placement of temporary buildings that are not capital construction projects on the territory of the city of Yaroslavl, temporary buildings that are not OKS also include buildings (structures) that are not related to real estate objects: sites equipped with a canopy for waiting for passengers of public transport, with a kiosk (stop complex), areas for learning to drive vehicles, temporary parking lots and parking lots, temporary trade and service facilities. Temporary buildings also include cellular antenna mast structures.

The classification of specific buildings as temporary in the event of a trial is made by the court, based on the existing legislative and theoretical-practical characteristics of real estate. In particular, in its arbitration appeal court indicated that despite the fact that currently no regulatory act fully defines a “temporary structure”, this does not mean that because of this it is impossible to classify this or that structure as temporary structures, based on the general requirements of the law, and the mere presence of central heating and water supply in a structure cannot yet indicate that such a structure is an immovable thing.

The Federal Arbitration Court also produced an additional, in comparison with the legislative, list of objects that cannot be classified as OKS (real estate) and which are temporary buildings. In this ruling, the court indicated, with reference to paragraph 1 of Art. 130 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, that the creation of all kinds of easily erected structures, light prefabricated structures indicates the absence of a strong connection of such objects with the ground and the possibility of moving them without compromising their purpose, and therefore these objects are non-permanent structures and cannot be classified as real estate : including objects that do not have a foundation, with walls and ceilings made of metal structures, shopping arcades... From all this, the court concludes that ownership of these objects is not subject to state registration in accordance with Art. 131 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, since they are not real estate objects, because are buildings that are not related to capital construction projects, and are also objects of auxiliary use.

Thus, the legislation and existing judicial practice equate the real estate with the public buildings, and temporary buildings are not classified as one of this category of objects as not having the necessary characteristics. Accordingly, the ownership of temporary buildings as movable things is not subject to state registration, and in the case of filing documents for registration of such buildings, the registering authorities must refuse to accept documents on the specified basis.

However, the mere receipt by a person of a certificate of ownership of an object does not automatically lead to the court recognizing this object as real estate in the absence of the necessary documents confirming the classification of the object as real estate - the allocation of the corresponding plot for capital construction, etc. In this regard, it follows distinguish between a trade pavilion as a public space and a temporary pavilion that is not real estate.

In another case, the court considered that a shopping pavilion is an immovable object (OKS) on the basis that it was agreed upon and built by a legal entity precisely as a capital construction object with registration and approval required in accordance with the law, despite the fact that the municipal authority authorities insisted that a legal entity does not have the right to build a permanent building.

In a different situation, the court, having established that the disputed structure - a prefabricated trade pavilion does not meet the criteria established by regulatory legal acts for classifying the object as real estate, since it is a non-stationary, temporary structure that did not receive a construction permit in connection with this and was erected on land for short-term lease, declared the state registration of ownership of this object illegal. And the conclusion of the State Unitary Enterprise Central Research Institute of Building Structures, available in the case materials, according to which the disputed structure was permanent and not temporary, did not affect the said court decision.

If, from the documents issued by the authorized body carrying out technical registration, it follows that the object has signs indicating that it is firmly connected to the ground, i.e. is an object, the movement of which without disproportionate damage to its purpose is impossible, then the registering authority carries out state registration of the right to such an object. Therefore, when it follows from the case materials that the will of the local government body was actually aimed at creating a real estate object, despite the fact that the specified object is called in the documents a temporary trade and exhibition pavilion, the court recognizes such an object as real estate.

Unlike temporary buildings, recognition of an object as an auxiliary structure cannot automatically lead to a refusal to recognize this object as real estate (RMP): being an auxiliary structure and not being a temporary structure, the object will simultaneously be real estate, i.e. ownership of it will be subject to state registration.

What does the legislation classify as auxiliary structures, which, however, are also not required to obtain a building permit?

According to GOST 27751-88 “Reliability of building structures and foundations,” buildings and structures for auxiliary use should be understood as structures of a reduced level of responsibility. These include greenhouses, greenhouses, summer pavilions, small warehouses and similar structures. Of course, such structures can be not only temporary, but also stationary (immovable): for example, a warehouse fundamentally built to serve a shopping complex or a holiday home.

Of Soviet legislation, paragraph 20 of the Letter of the Ministry of Housing and Communal Services of the RSFSR dated 03/09/1977 No. 15-1-103, which stated that non-residential civil buildings also include permanent non-residential buildings, is of interest auxiliary purpose, For example: the structure of a bathhouse, laundry, catering unit, garage, etc., located on the land plot of a special-purpose building(hospitals, sanatoriums, dispensaries, etc.). As we can see, this contained an approximate list of auxiliary structures, although for some reason they were simultaneously classified by the legislator as capital (whether by this concept a full-fledged OKS was meant or whether the legislator really meant an auxiliary structure in their modern interpretation is not entirely clear from the above normative act of the Soviet period due to the lack of a specific definition of these terms in it).

In accordance with clause 6 of the Explanations on the application of the provisions of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation regarding the implementation of state construction supervision, the criterion for classifying buildings and structures as auxiliary is the presence on the land plot in question of a main building, structure or structure in relation to which the new building or structure performs auxiliary or service function. Such structures include mobile prefabricated and container buildings and warehouses, garages, checkpoints for protecting objects and other similar structures. That is, this list of auxiliary structures contains both clearly temporary objects and stationary ones.

In this regard, the position of Gosstroy is also interesting, on whose website it was once explained that, for example, a swimming pool next to a country house or dacha will be an auxiliary structure, but a swimming pool built for sports and entertainment purposes as an independent structure is considered an auxiliary building. appointment cannot apply.

At the same time, taking into account such evaluative concepts in various regulations, a person, in the event of controversial situations, must provide strong evidence that the constructed structure is of an auxiliary nature: for example, an enterprise explained in court that on the territory of the agricultural complex it built a feed warehouse on the site of an existing one and a new one. rendering the same warehouse unusable, classifying it as an auxiliary building for livestock farms, and therefore did not receive any permits for its construction. Meanwhile, the court did not agree with this point of view, indicating in its ruling the following: since, according to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation
the creation of structures on the site of demolished capital construction projects also relates to construction, and there is no evidence that the constructed warehouse belongs to auxiliary buildings in the case materials, then the conclusion that the enterprise did not require permits for the construction of this warehouse is unfounded in this situation and, accordingly , the construction of such a facility is illegal.

It should be especially noted that it is important for the construction subject not to make a mistake when classifying a property to one or another of these categories, since such an error may subsequently lead to the fact that the subject will be sure that he does not need to obtain permission for the construction of real estate, having considered it for an object of an auxiliary nature, which is fraught with the impossibility of completing purchase and sale transactions with such an object and its demolition as an unauthorized building and within the framework of Art. 222 Civil Code of the Russian Federation.

However, here it must be borne in mind that, within the meaning of this article of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, only OKS (real estate) can be recognized as unauthorized buildings, and temporary buildings will not be considered unauthorized buildings, from which it follows that if the disputed object is not real estate (it is collapsible structure), then it cannot be demolished in accordance with the provisions of Art. 222 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, i.e. at the expense of the person who built it.

Thus, the court found that a gas station, which is a real estate object (capital construction), was illegally built on a land plot allocated on a lease basis for the construction of a temporary non-capital gas station, and therefore the constructed facility constitutes an unauthorized construction, the ownership of which is not arises because it is not the object of civil rights and, therefore, its purchase and sale and registration of ownership of it will be illegal.

As for the issue of bringing to administrative responsibility for the lack of necessary permits during the construction of objects, in order to lawfully bring a person to it, the supervisory authority must find out what kind of permission the person brought to such responsibility needed to obtain: for the construction of a separately constructed building or for a complex buildings under construction at the same address. If such circumstances are not adequately taken into account when imposing an administrative penalty, then bringing a person to justice may subsequently be recognized as illegal. Accordingly, if it turns out that the object for the construction of which a person was brought to administrative liability without permission will be a temporary or auxiliary structure, then such liability of the person will be unlawful.

Notes

1. Resolution of the mayor of Yaroslavl dated May 15, 2007 No. 1519 “On the placement in the city of Yaroslavl of temporary buildings that are not objects of capital construction” (together with the “Regulation on the placement of temporary buildings that are not objects of capital construction on the territory of the city of Yaroslavl”) .

2. Resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated March 2, 2009 No. 09AP-2171/2009-AK in case No. A40-74887/08-153-625.

3. Resolution of the Seventeenth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated January 29, 2009 in case No. A60-19089/2008.

4. Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Moscow District dated February 13, 2008 No. KG-A41/159-08 in case No. A41-K1-2108/07.

5. Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Moscow District dated October 4, 2005 No. KG-A41/9448-05.

6. Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Moscow District dated July 26, 2007, July 27, 2007 No. KG-A40/7019-07-P in case No. A40-22340/06-50-178.

7. Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Moscow District dated July 5, 2006 No. KG-A40/5041-06 in case No. A40-50476/05-50-462.

8. Resolution of the Eighteenth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated March 12, 2009 No. 18AP-1499/2009 in case No. A07-15333/2008.

9. Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the North-Western District dated December 26, 2006 in case No. A05-10593/2006-29.

10. Determination of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation dated April 20, 2009 No. VAS-3873/09 in case No. A14-6848/2007-263/32.

11. Resolution of the Tenth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated January 12, 2009 in case No. A41-K1-13135/07.

12. Determination of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation dated June 8, 2009 No. VAS-6731/09 in case No. A76-25766/2007-4-677/150.

13. Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Moscow District dated August 27, 2008 No. KA-A40/7698-08 in case No. A40-17171/08-79-213.

EMELYANOV Alexander Sergeevich. Experience in legal work - since 2001. Legal consultant of Spetsstroyservis-R LLC.

Arched hangars, construction of hangars. Peculiarities.

The main feature of this construction of hangars there will be high speed. That is, frameless construction technology can significantly increase the speed of work. In addition, the absence of labor-intensive work and supporting metal structures in the construction arched hangars ensures ease of construction in any conditions. It is also worth highlighting the technological process, which involves construction of frameless hangars with minimal participation of equipment and qualified personnel due to production automation.

Hangars price. Arched hangars.

This issue will be no less important for the customer than product quality. In particular, prefabricated structures and arched hangars will be less expensive than standard designs by half. That is, when choosing a reliable prefabricated hangar the client saves costs twice as early as at the construction stage, and also saves during operation due to minimal maintenance requirements.

Please note that the cost arched hangar will depend on its internal area. The calculation is carried out based on the actual space used, which is carefully calculated and indicated in the project. At the same time, cost savings are based on several points at once - no need to form a foundation, minimal load on supporting structures, as well as a significant expansion of internal space due to the exclusion of additional elements for strengthening in construction prefabricated building .

Choosing prefabricated hangars , the client gets the opportunity to install the structure in a minimum time due to ready-made sets of structures.

Separately, we should highlight the possibility of installing this type non-constructed buildings in difficult climatic conditions. Our arched hangars provide for prolonged precipitation, large amounts of snow or heavy rain. In any of these situations, the structure will not be damaged and will keep transport, grain or any other things inside frameless hangar . Moreover, construction is possible even in those areas where the use of heavy equipment is not possible.

Arched hangars. Models of frameless hangars.

Our company offers to choose prefabricated building , which will be an ideal option in each specific case. First of all, the length arched hangar is not limited by anything other than the imagination or desire of our clients. That is, you can form a structure of any length. The width is selected depending on the type of structure. You can create a hangar up to 21 meters wide even in difficult operating conditions.

All types of models and designs arched hangars are distinguished by high quality and durability. We suggest using prefabricated buildings , which will be truly the best option for storing equipment, grain, or even raising livestock. You choose the option yourself collapsible hangar , which will satisfy all requirements.

It is important to emphasize that we have already developed and implemented many unique projects that allow you to immediately formulate a task and create arched hangar for the workshop, perform construction of frameless warehouses or other options for prefabricated buildings. You can explore the entire range of products, as well as supplement ready-made projects with your wishes and requirements.

When choosing a separate project, our experts recommend paying attention to factors such as dimensions, insulation or design arched hangar. Accordingly, we will help you choose prefabricated building, which will be ideal for your purposes and easy to operate in a specific climate zone.

Prefabricated collapsible hangar price from 2100 rub/m2 .

Prefabricated collapsible hangar price from 2650 rub/m2 .

. S

Hangars construction of prefabricated collapsible hangars.

The company "super HANGAR" is the official distributor With boron collapsible hangars , produced using Canadian technology.

Innovative Canadian technology construction of hangars allows you to achieve stability, strength and durability of the structure with minimal labor costs. It only takes a few days to complete the installation. frameless hangars , which can stand for an unlimited amount of time with virtually no need for additional care measures.

This technique is the result of more than 60 years of development, which made it possible to create the optimal technology for performing construction of hangars in any conditions.

Hangars. Construction of frameless hangars. Installation.

Among the features that characterize construction of hangars , we can highlight the simplicity of the work process. In particular, such work includes only three main stages:

Production - All parts of the structure are manufactured at the factory and are immediately ready for installation on site.

Delivery - Transportation of parts of the structure is carried out by any transport of the customer’s choosing.

Assembly - All parts of the structure are quickly assembled due to a well-thought-out system. The technology can be compared to assembling a regular construction set with huge dimensions of each part.

Features of the material - In production prefabricated hangars they use structural steel with class 1 coating. In addition, when , the base material is coated with zinc, which also increases the service life and improves its characteristics.

In particular, the material arched hangars has the following properties: minimal exposure to moisture, which eliminates corrosion processes during operation; resistance to mechanical stress due to the strength of the material; no deformation when exposed to temperature; fire safety - the material is not flammable; safe for human use; no release of harmful substances when heated or other negative factors.

Of course, these are not all the features of using structural steel in the formation prefabricated hangars various types of purposes. In order to clarify more detailed characteristics of the material, you can contact the service managers, who will provide a complete description of each type of hangar.

Installation of an arched hangar- First of all, construction of arched hangars will not require heavy equipment or a large staff of specialists. Well-thought-out technology involves the participation of a limited number of professionals and an automated process, which also eliminates errors or flaws in the construction of the structure.

Construction of arched hangars, prefabricated and dismountable. Main stages.

Formation of the foundation - This is the initial stage, which requires the creation of a foundation - preparation of the site and foundation for construction of arched hangars and structures. A strip foundation is used, which allows the structure to be firmly secured and stable.

Assembly - It should be emphasized that construction of arched hangars has a specific methodology; each kit comes with detailed assembly instructions. This assembly method eliminates welding and damage to the material structure. All structural parts are assembled using bolted connections.

Moreover, during the assembly stage arched hangar Additional gaskets are used to increase strength and resistance to moisture or precipitation. Gaskets also provide better protection for storage of equipment, grain or materials.

Installation - It is important to emphasize that the assembly of all parts prefabricated hangar carried out on a flat area, and only then it is fastened and the arches are transferred to the foundation base. That is, the structure of the arches is transferred and secured with anchors to the foundation, ensuring high quality installation and strength arched hangar.

Length selection - Note that construction of arched hangars can be made in various sizes, and the length of the structure is chosen by the customer himself. At the same time, it is formed by installing a certain number of arched structures. That is, the number of arches that will be installed will determine the length of the structure itself.

Building broach - This stage requires strong fastening of all bolts to connect the arches to the foundation. Accordingly, at this stage the structure is secured, but without installing the ends.

D additional equipment and hangar ends - This stage will be the final one. Ends, additional equipment ordered by the client, as well as gates, ventilation or doors and windows are installed.

Special panels can be installed to transmit light or other parts of the structure, which can be studied in the catalog.

If you have a need to build a hangar, regardless of its purpose, be it a warehouse, granary, car service center or workshop, you need to understand whether a permit for its construction will be required and what documents will be needed. It is better to familiarize yourself with the legal requirements in advance and prepare the relevant documents in order to avoid huge fines and orders to dismantle the structure.

According to Article 51 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, a construction permit is required if your hangar is recognized as real estate. Legislation defines “real estate” as objects that are firmly connected to the land, or objects whose movement without disproportionate damage to their purpose is impossible. If your hangar is a temporary or auxiliary structure, then a permit is not required.

In addition, the characteristics inherent to real estate and associated with continuity with the ground include such characteristic features as the presence of a foundation and the impossibility of separating an object from the foundation without causing significant damage to it, the presence of various communications in it: gas, electricity, water and etc.

To avoid bureaucratic delays, many try to register the building as movable property (temporary or auxiliary). The line is very thin. Judicial practice shows that hangars made of metal structures, including frameless hangars, can be classified as both movable and immovable property.

It should also be noted that it is important not to make a mistake when assigning a property to one or another of these categories, since such an error may subsequently lead to the fact that the lack of the need to obtain permission for the construction of a hangar is fraught with the impossibility of making purchase and sale transactions with such an object. its demolition as an unauthorized construction and within the framework of Art. 222 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.

In most cases, in order to classify a hangar as movable property and eliminate the need to obtain a construction permit, correctly drawn up design documentation is sufficient. Prefabricated hangars with bolted joints are considered temporary structures and do not require permits. A design office can tell you more accurately whether your future hangar will be a permanent building.

It is also necessary to take into account that the construction of hangars exceeding 1500 sq.m. will require a state examination.

Documents required for the construction of a hangar:

If your hangar requires a permit, then, regardless of the subject of the Russian Federation, you need to prepare the following documents:
-technical conditions that make it possible to justify the feasibility of erecting a structure;
-a certificate confirming that the land plot is owned or a land lease agreement;
-project documentation (KM, KZh, AR);
- application from a company or individual who is a developer.

The issuance of a permit for the construction of a hangar is issued only after the approval of the completed design documents.

Reasons for refusal to obtain permission to build a hangar

You must be prepared for the possibility that your permit may be denied. There can be many reasons for this, the most common are:
- violation of the architectural ensemble of the area;
- the structure does not comply with sanitary standards, fire safety, environmental standards, etc.;
- high groundwater level, soil instability, etc.

Typically, the government service responsible for issuing such permits offers the developer alternative options and areas for the construction of a hangar. In addition, it is proposed to change the technical and operational characteristics of the future structure (for example, reduce the length or height of the structure, use a different type of foundation, etc.). If the developer was refused permission without explanation, or he considers these reasons to be unfounded, then he has the right to file an application in court.

From all of the above, we can draw an unambiguous conclusion: if you do not want to bother with the design of your future hangar, choose a project with an area of ​​less than 1500 sq.m. made of lightweight metal structures with bolted connections and does not require a permanent foundation. These can be either arched or straight-walled hangars with an awning covering or sheathed with corrugated sheets. Pay close attention to the design documentation, which should indicate that the hangar has a prefabricated structure. Or, as an option, use pneumatic hangars (inflatable). In a number of cases, it is possible to design small frameless hangars as temporary structures.

Activities to coordinate the design of the future hangar take a very long time and are associated with a huge number of bureaucratic delays. To many people who have not previously dealt with this procedure, it will seem illogical and difficult. Communication with regulatory authorities cannot be avoided at any stage of the approval process.

Often contractors try to relieve themselves of the burden of approvals, creating global problems for the customer.

Coordination of the future structure and issuance of a permit for its construction

In all parts of the country, uniform standards for completing the approval procedure apply. Sometimes subjects only expand the list of papers that the authorized body accepts to consider the issue on its merits. In a classic situation, the list of required documents includes:

Specifications to justify the feasibility of creating the specified building;

documentation confirming that the applicant has authority to dispose and own the land plot;

set of design documents;

a duly completed application form from the developer - citizen or company.

For structures with an area of ​​less than 1500 sq.m., the organization of state examination is not required.

Problem:the enterprise has a certain territory under the authority of the owner and has planned to create a new metal hangar on it, where goods ready for sale will be stored. The design of the hangar being created is of the collapsible type. In this situation, is it necessary to obtain a permit giving the initiator the rights to build?

Clause 1 Article 51 Civil Code of the Russian Federation describes the construction permit as a form indicating full compliance of the design documentation with the current GPZU standards. This paper gives the developer legal authority to carry out construction activities and operations for the reconstruction of capital buildings and carry out their major repairs. Exceptions are made only for cases reflected in other provisions of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.

P.2 This article indicates the urgent need for the developer to obtain a permit form in situations where the implementation of measures for the reconstruction and arrangement of capital objects, as well as their major repairs, affects the durability, safety for people and reliability of the building.

Clause 17 This article limits the list of objects for which construction activities are not required to issue a permit.

Obtaining this permit loses its relevance if construction work and reconstruction activities are organized in relation to structures that do not belong to the number of capital buildings.

The need to issue a permit is largely determined by whether the structure belongs to a certain category: temporary (auxiliary) structures or real estate.

Information about the concepts of real estate and movable objects can be gleaned from Article 130 of the current version of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. It allows us to classify as real estate any structures that have an inextricable relationship with the territory located underneath them, as well as objects that cannot be moved without causing disproportionate damage to their purpose. For such buildings, obtaining a construction permit is one of the mandatory events organized in accordance with the existing norms of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.

The courts take a similar approach in relation to disputes about whether a particular structure belongs to the category of real estate or movable property. The servants of Themis subject a detailed study to the presence of a temporary nature of the building, signs of a capital object. The courts have the power to establish the legal and physical connection of a structure with the territory it occupies.

Judicial practice demonstrates that in most disputes metal hangars are classified as immovable objects. In the decision-making process, judges are guided by the fact that the object has signs of a permanent construction:

built on a concrete strip foundation with metal openings and a concrete floor;

has ceilings, walls and roof made of galvanized sheet metal;

The technical passport contains an indication of the presence of electric lighting in the structure.

A painstaking analysis of existing law enforcement practice in this matter indicates the need for a comprehensive study of the characteristics of property:

the presence of an inextricable relationship with the territory located under the structure;

the intended purpose of the hangar planned for creation;

the absence or presence of a foundation for the future structure - a foundation, as well as its variety;

the presence of floors and main walls;

availability of communication inputs.

In addition to the parameters listed above, it is necessary to take into account other technical characteristics of the structure being created. Only such a global approach to the study of a building will allow us to obtain a reliable answer to the previously asked question. Before checking out, check whether you have done