Vladislav Morozov atomic tankers. Atomic tankers. nuclear war of the ussr against nato. About the book “atomic tankers. nuclear war of the ussr against nato "vladislav morozov

- Then the problem has no solution. My guys, of course, are calculating all possible options, but who will guarantee that a nuclear war will not start over some nonsense?

- What do you specifically mean?

- Let's say if something similar to a war happens in Europe now, in accordance with the concept you have outlined (that is, with the use of conventional weapons to the maximum and balancing on the brink of nuclear war), our strategic forces will not be involved. Because they can only be applied once. First and last. It was in Cambodia that the "B-52" literally filled the jungle with shallow ponds and lakes, which formed on the site of bomb craters. And now, in densely populated Germany or Belgium, there is simply no point in bombing the squares, they will not understand us, because they have not forgotten our bombing during the last war, and no one will allow us to do this. But there are also our operational-tactical missiles in Europe, as well as atomic bombs, nuclear charges for artillery systems and chemical weapons, which are under local command. And after all, there is no effective "protection from the fool" and the generals, among whom are full of people who are too militant or simply not brilliant in their intelligence, have every right to use them at their discretion, if they receive the appropriate order. What if, because of Poland, everything will start in earnest and an order will follow to increase combat readiness to the "red" level? What if someone at the same time will misinterpret this very increased combat readiness? After all, with communication, if everything suddenly starts in earnest, there will be big problems. And imagine what will happen if some overly zealous or timid general orders to strike with a tactical nuclear charge, say, at a Russian tank column, and the Soviets, in response to this, release their entire arsenal at us. After all, the actual use of even one nuclear charge is a sufficient reason for a full-scale war ...

At this point, the colonel fell silent, and a painful pause hung in the air, during which each of them thought about his own. General Jones was looking somewhere past the colonel, and from the fact that the authorities were trying not to look him in the eyes, Pierce realized that the general was not just bad, but very hard. He was not wrong. The general mentally why in vain covered the last words of the dear president and other politicians from the White House, who, for some reason, clinging to another geopolitical chimera, thereby found themselves an interesting occupation for some time (the general, like many in the Pentagon, quite sincerely believed all this "Polish project" is something like a masochistic handicraft) and had no idea how these games of theirs with fire could end. And besides, he once again realized how hard the lot of a commander who must plan a major military operation own losses will be either minimal or none at all. That is, he is required to start a war in conditions when all plans consist of the same “if”, such as: “if the Poles start a revolution”, “if we land”, “if we don’t land”, “if the Soviets start”, “if The Soviets won't start. " Idiocy and profanity ... And Colonel Pierce, who also knew and understood everything too well, wondered how all this fuss with unpredictable consequences threatened him personally. The wife and two children are in Harrington, the parents are in New York, the father-in-law and mother-in-law are in Birmingham, and the brother and family are in Albany. Some idiot here in Europe will shoot once - so what? For example, it will be possible to warn the family in advance, but then what? The colonel himself could have hoped that for some time he would sit out in the bunker of one of the NATO command centers (unless, of course, he was baked or flooded with a direct hit) in Belgium or the Federal Republic of Germany, but where would they all go in case of a disaster? Off the beaten path, to the provinces, since it was somehow not fashionable to strengthen basements and build anti-nuclear shelters among American ordinary people (not counting individual paranoids) over the past two decades? So after all, in the American wilderness here and there are stuck airbases, missile silos and other secret training ranges and radar station antennas, which in the event of war, in any case, are "targets number one." After all, if the Russians start in earnest, everything, apparently, will be like in some NORAD exercises. "Three hundred aerial targets from the northeast." Well, they will press the button in response - so what? Who will benefit from this? All the same, within an hour and a half, 90% of the US population will turn into smoke and other combustion products, and the survival of the rest will be exclusively random ... The colonel even got a headache from such thoughts.

- And how do you think this can be avoided? - finally broke the silence of the general, oppressed by equally filthy reflections.

“Nothing,” the colonel replied with utmost honesty. - To enter some additional codes and so on, we still do not have time. And if the commanders of armies or divisions independently make decisions on the use of subordinate missile, artillery and air assets, it cannot be guaranteed that this will not lead to a nuclear war if targets in East Germany or Poland are attacked - this is one thing. And if, for example, the European part of Russia - the Soviets will have more than an iron reason to immediately retaliate with a nuclear strike with all available forces. Moreover, before, for example, Kaliningrad in the former East Prussia, tactical aircraft with atomic bombs quite capable of flying. It is necessary to at least partially tighten the existing rules.

Atomic tankers. Nuclear war of the USSR against NATO Vladislav Morozov

(No ratings yet)

Title: Atomic Tankmen. Nuclear war of the USSR against NATO

About the book “Atomic Tankers. Nuclear war of the USSR against NATO "Vladislav Morozov

FIRST front-line militant about the nuclear war of the USSR against NATO. The most realistic and reliable novel, simulating the crushing blow of Soviet tank armies on Western Europe with documentary accuracy.

1982 year. The death of Brezhnev and the political crisis in Poland provoke a direct military clash between the USSR and the United States. Trying to stop the avalanche of Soviet tanks, Reagan orders the use of tactical nuclear weapons... Andropov responds in kind. Over the scorched earth, through clouds of radioactive dust and zones of complete destruction, ATOMIC TANKERS of the USSR are rushing to the English Channel ...

The fingers are already on the "red buttons". The strategic nuclear forces are on full alert. The world is teetering on the brink of a total Apocalypse ...

This novel is a unique opportunity to see a nuclear war not only from the Kremlin and Washington, but also through the triplexes T-72, Abrams and Leopards, from the cabins of MiGs, Tu-22, F-15, Thunderbolts and Phantoms ", from the combat formations of the Airborne Forces and the Marines ...

On our website about books lifeinbooks.net you can download for free without registration or read online book“Atomic tankers. Nuclear War of the USSR against NATO "Vladislav Morozov in epub, fb2, txt, rtf, pdf formats for iPad, iPhone, Android and Kindle. The book will give you a lot of pleasant moments and real pleasure from reading. You can buy the full version from our partner. Also, here you will find the latest news from the literary world, find out the biography of your favorite authors. For aspiring writers, there is a separate section with useful tips and recommendations, interesting articles, thanks to which you yourself can try your hand at literary skill.

About literature.

The name seems pretentious. But closer to the end, it is fully explained. And it fully justifies itself.

The psychological portraits of the main characters are written, if not excellent, then very high level... Most importantly, they are real. How, for example, is absolutely real nostalgic and touching scene of inspection by a Soviet officer (a major tanker who had fought in Africa before, that is, having seen something, and not only in terms of the war itself) of a video rental salon on the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany ( those who remember both the 80s and 90s will understand).

Another thing is that readers who did not find the USSR at the age of 20+ (or even better 25+) will hardly be able to evaluate this, taking into account the amendment for the duration of the action.

As for me, this historical-psychological component in the book is simply inseparable from the military-alt-historical one. Below I will tell you what causes me a certain skepticism. But I believed in this unconditionally: “… nobody wants to die, and it’s just that no one and no army in the world has had such an experience today. We are the first, damn it ... In my head, for some reason, alternately sounded either the melody “Our proud“ Varyag ”does not surrender to the enemy, then the funeral march, and childhood memories floated up before our eyes, of how some honored veteran was buried in our Krasnobel cemetery. Orders on velvet cushions, an elegant red velvet coffin and a threefold volley of blanks into the air ... ”. This is in a battened-down tank a minute before a nuclear strike.

By and large, no one expects literary merits from the domestic military AI. That is, it is waiting, of course, but it does not seriously count on their presence. "Tankers ..." in this regard are not some kind of qualitative leap, but they definitely differ from their brethren for the better.

As a rule, it was customary to redraw history in our country until June 1941. The later options did not work. It seems that few people take the risk of taking over the years, which, so to speak, are still fresh in the memory.

Again, it is customary for us to reshape history with the help of the popes. At least quickly, having won Tsushima, at least slowly, introducing technologies (from business to industrial) of the beginning of the XXI century at any time.

So, "Tankists ..." is favorably distinguished by everything. The time closest to us is 1982, a clearly defined bifurcation point and a complete absence of hitting. No one comes to Andropov with a box of iPhones, knowledge of fluctuations in oil prices for the coming years and a list of party officials who have ruined the USSR.

How realistic is the described AI fork? IMHO, quite.

How realistic is what happens next? Well, the success of the SA warms the soul unconditionally. But they make him curl a little eyebrow in amazement. Especially when they are justified by numerous refusals of NATO equipment. Although transcendentally unreal and do not look.

Not so much to all AI lovers and fans of technotrillers, as their parts of a certain age and worldview. Cynically accentuating, fans of the red revenge.

About the assessment.

At times I wanted to deliver more, at times - a little less. But since I am at least half of the target audience, I settled on a fairly high rating on my own scale. Poorly crafted opuses promoting the glory of Russian / Soviet / Russian weapons and the heroism of our soldiers, I add a point for patriotism. I can do it here. The book does not need any "postscripts". She's good anyway, just as good as it is.

But I will note that oh-oh-very much will depend on the second part. Or how many more will there be - two? How the author completes his AI in a plot. Here, by the way, lies a very big complexity. So I'm waiting.

And more about the target audience.

There are definitely those who want to laugh, or even spit on one of the supporting characters named Vladimir Vladimirovich. Moreover, according to the timing of the RI, his participation in what is happening in a specific role is far-fetched. Although theoretically it could have turned that way. Well, we're talking about the target audience again. I hope this will serve as a warning for some of my colleagues. In order not to waste time on "Tankers ..."

"Get up, American lump!" - Private Urasbayev - to a captive Negro Marine.

Vladislav Morozov

Atomic tankers. Nuclear war of the USSR against NATO

Dedicated to the last soldiers of the empire - all those who served in the Group of Soviet Forces abroad and participated in all local wars and armed conflicts from 1945 to 1991.

Something like a historical reference

I stepped on that trail hot.

I was there. I lived then ...

A. Tvardovsky. "Vasily Terkin" (chapter "On the Dnieper")

1982 unexpectedly became, perhaps, one of the most difficult in the entire history of the post-war global military-political confrontation between the world superpowers.

Against the background of the ongoing war for the Falkland Islands (Malvinas), the wars in Afghanistan, Angola, Lebanon, Ethiopia, Nicaragua, El Salvador and the Iranian-Iraqi war, the situation in Europe has deteriorated sharply.

Government of the People's Republic of Poland headed by the general secretary The PUWP Stanislaw Kanei too long followed the lead of organizations whose activities in the West were characterized as "a just civil protest against totalitarianism" (the main of these organizations was the trade union "Solidarity"), preventing the Polish military leadership from declaring martial law in the country.

As a result, on March 8, 1982, with a fairly strange circumstances the USSR Ambassador to Poland A.G. Fufayev - while returning from a party conference in Minsk-Mazovetsky to Warsaw, a truck crashed into his limousine. The deceased truck driver Andrzej Krainowski turned out to be an active member of Solidarity, although his malicious intent in this accident was not proven.

On March 10, 1982, one of the leaders of Solidarity, Jacek Kuron, died in prison under unexplained circumstances (the official cause of death was banal heart failure, but no one wanted to believe it), whose death caused a new wave of demonstrations and other protest actions not only in Pomeranian region (Gdansk - Gdynia), but also throughout the Polish People's Republic.

On March 17 and 19, 1982, there were attacks on the permanent deployment sites of the 19th Separate Signal and Automatic Control Regiment (Legnitz) and the 155th Red Banner Tank Regiment (Sventoszów) of the Northern Group of Soviet Forces in order to seize weapons and military equipment. The sentries were forced to open fire to kill. As a result, 5 Soviet servicemen were wounded, 4 were killed and more than 30 were wounded from among the attackers. More than a hundred people involved in the attack were arrested by the Polish Ministry of Internal Affairs and the state security authorities, which in the West was immediately declared "unfounded repression."

On March 20, 1982, increased combat readiness was declared in the units of the Northern Group of Soviet Forces deployed in Poland.

On March 22, 1982, General of the Army V. Jaruzelski became the general secretary of the PUWP. The next day, martial law was introduced throughout the Polish People's Republic. The US leadership immediately made a number of very harsh statements, announcing new economic sanctions against the USSR and Poland, the NDP was deprived of its "most favored nation status in trade", and its application to join the International Monetary Fund was blocked.

At the same time, some of the most active leaders of Solidarity and other similar organizations, surprisingly enough, managed to avoid arrest and internment. So, Lech Walesa (together with his large family) and Marian Yurchik managed to illegally leave the territory of Poland and through Sweden to get to Western Europe, and then to the USA.

On April 22, 1982, “after a serious and prolonged illness,” Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev, General Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee, died. The new leader of the USSR after his funeral was Yuri Vladimirovich Andropov.

L. Walesa, M. Yurchik and other figures like them, while in the United States, made a number of loud and frankly provocative statements about the situation in Poland and found support and understanding in government circles of most Western countries.

And on May 10, 1982, US President Ronald Reagan, speaking at the convention of the Catholic League of Religious and civil rights USA (M. Yurchik spoke to him at the same congress) in New York, publicly announced that what is happening now in Poland is "a heinous violence against the most advanced part of Polish society, which does not want to continue suffering under the red boot." In the same speech, the USSR was first called the "evil empire" and "the center of evil in modern world", Whose" exorbitant appetites should be shortened long ago, "and all the communists, without exception, were declared" deeply and fundamentally immoral. "

In a response, TASS said that "the Reagan administration, unfortunately, is able to think and talk, only in terms of confrontation and militant, mindlessly cave-like anti-communism."

After this presidential speech, a number of US congressmen and Republican senators put forward proposals on the need to provide "Polish opposition anti-communist and anti-totalitarian forces" not only moral and financial, but, if necessary, any other assistance, including military. The Polish diaspora in the United States and Canada even announced "fundraising and recruiting volunteers to organize an insurrectionary movement on Polish territory against the Soviet occupation forces and the government of V. Jaruzelski."

The summer of 1982 began with large-scale military preparations on both sides of the Elbe. NATO troops were preparing for the extraordinary "Reformer-13" exercises, and the Warsaw Pact for the long-planned "Shield-82" exercises. The training was carried out in conditions of a constant increase in tension and heightened combat readiness ...

Chapter 1. People and goals

“In general, Yuri Vladimirovich, despite the introduction of martial law, the situation in Poland remains tense,” the officer continued his report.

For more than twenty minutes the Secretary General had been carefully examining him through the thick lenses of his glasses, noting for himself that the speaker's suit and tie were clearly of Western production. However, this did not cause negative emotions in Andropov, since he always believed that the officer state security in any setting should not look like a wahlak. And this young, short colonel with an agreeable and at the same time not memorable face (almost an ideal combination for the organization in which he served) was chosen as an "officer for special assignments" by Andropov himself largely by chance, after the March this year's events in Poland.